Welfare

A family support centre in Saint Peter Port, Guernsey, which provides assistance to families with children.

Welfare (or commonly, social welfare) is a type of government support intended to ensure that members of a society can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter.^[1] Social security may either be synonymous with welfare,^[a] or refer specifically to social insurance programs which provide support only to those who have previously contributed (e.g. most pension systems), as opposed to social assistance programs which provide support on the basis of need alone (e.g. most disability benefits).^[6]^[7] The International Labour Organization defines social security as covering support for those in old age, support for the maintenance of children, medical treatment, parental and sick leave, unemployment and disability benefits, and support for sufferers of occupational injury.^[8]^[9]

More broadly, welfare may also encompass efforts to provide a basic level of well-being through free or subsidized social services such as healthcare, education, vocational training and public housing.^[10]^[11] In a welfare state, the State assumes responsibility for the health, education, and welfare of society, providing a range of social services such as those described.^[11]

The first codified universal government welfare was instituted in the 7th century (634 CE) in the time of the Rashidun caliph Umar.^[12] The first welfare state was Imperial Germany (1871–1918), where the Bismarck government introduced social security in 1889.^[13] In the early 20th century, the United Kingdom introduced social security around 1913, and adopted the welfare state with the National Insurance Act 1946, during the Attlee government (1945–51).^[11] In the countries of western Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, social welfare is mainly provided by the government out of the national tax revenues, and to a lesser extent by non-government organizations (NGOs), and charities (social and religious).^[11] A right to social security and an adequate standard of living is asserted in Articles 22 and 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.^[6]^[b]

History[edit]

Distributing alms to the poor, abbey of Port-Royal des Champs c. 1710.

In the Roman Empire, the first emperor Augustus provided the Cura Annonae or grain dole for citizens who could not afford to buy food every month. Social welfare was enlarged by the Emperor Trajan.^[15] Trajan's program brought acclaim from many, including Pliny the Younger.^[16] The Song dynasty government (960 CE) supported multiple programs which could be classified as social welfare, including the establishment of retirement homes, public clinics, and paupers' graveyards. According to economist Robert Henry Nelson, "The medieval Roman Catholic Church operated a far-reaching and comprehensive welfare system for the poor ..."^[17]^[18] From the 14th century onward the governments of the Italian city-states began to partner with the church to provide welfare and education to the lower classes.^[19] In later Protestant European nations such as the Dutch Republic welfare was managed by local guilds until the abolition of the guild system in the early 19th century.^[20]^[21] In the free imperial cities of the Holy Roman Empire the city governments in cities like Nuremberg could take control of the collection and distribution of public welfare.^[22]

The 7th century caliph Umar implemented a form of zakat, one of the Five Pillars of Islam, as a codified universal social security tax.^[23] Traditionally estimated at 2.5% of an individual's assets, government zakat funds were distributed to various groups of Muslims, including impoverished people and those in severe debt.^[24]^[25] The collection of zakat increased during the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates, though the zakat system was frequently inefficient and corrupt; Islamic jurists often instructed Muslims to distribute money to the needy directly instead to maximize its impact.^[26]

Likewise, in Jewish tradition, charity (represented by tzedakah) is a matter of religious obligation rather than benevolence. Contemporary charity is regarded as a continuation of the Biblical Maaser Ani, or poor-tithe, as well as Biblical practices, such as permitting the poor to glean the corners of a field and harvest during the Shmita (Sabbatical year).

There is relatively little statistical data on transfer payments before the High Middle Ages. In the medieval period and until the Industrial Revolution, the function of welfare payments in Europe was achieved through private giving or charity, through numerous confraternities and activities of different religious orders. Early welfare programs in Europe included the English Poor Law of 1601, which gave parishes the responsibility for providing welfare payments to the poor.^[27] This system was substantially modified by the 19th-century Poor Law Amendment Act, which introduced the system of workhouses.

It was predominantly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that an organized system of state welfare provision was introduced in many countries. Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, introduced one of the first welfare systems for the working classes.^[28] In Great Britain the Liberal government of Henry Campbell-Bannerman and David Lloyd George introduced the National Insurance system in 1911,^[29] a system later expanded by Clement Attlee.

Modern welfare states include Germany, France, the Netherlands,^[30] as well as the Nordic countries, such as Iceland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland^[31] which employ a system known as the Nordic model. Esping-Andersen classified the most developed welfare state systems into three categories; Social Democratic, Conservative, and Liberal.^[32]

A report published by the ILO in 2014 estimated that only 27% of the world's population has access to comprehensive social security.^[33] The World Bank's 2019 World Development Report argues that the traditional payroll-based model of many kinds of social insurance are "increasingly challenged by working arrangements outside standard employment contracts".^[28]

Forms[edit]

Welfare can take a variety of forms, such as monetary payments, subsidies and vouchers, or housing assistance. Welfare systems differ from country to country, but welfare is commonly provided to individuals who are unemployed, those with illness or disability, the elderly, those with dependent children, and veterans. Programs may have a variety of conditions for a person to receive welfare:

Social protection[edit]

In developing countries, formal social security arrangements are often absent for the vast majority of the working population, in part due to reliance on the informal economy. Additionally, the state's capacity to reach people may be limited because of its limited infrastructure and resources. In this context, social protection is often referred to instead of social security, encompassing a broader set of means, such as labour market intervention and local community-based programs, to alleviate poverty and provide security against things like unemployment.^[34]^[35]^[36]

By country[edit]

Latin America[edit]

History[edit]

The 1980s, marked a change in the structure of Latin American social protection programs. Social protection embraces three major areas: social insurance, financed by workers and employers; social assistance to the population's poorest, financed by the state; and labor market regulations to protect worker rights.^[50] Although diverse, recent Latin American social policy has tended to concentrate on social assistance.

The 1980s, had a significant effect on social protection policies. Prior to the 1980s, most Latin American countries focused on social insurance policies involving formal sector workers, assuming that the informal sector would disappear with economic development. The economic crisis of the 1980s and the liberalization of the labor market led to a growing informal sector and a rapid increase in poverty and inequality. Latin American countries did not have the institutions and funds to properly handle such a crisis, both due to the structure of the social security system, and to the previously implemented structural adjustment policies (SAPs) that had decreased the size of the state.

New Welfare programs have integrated the multidimensional, social risk management, and capabilities approaches into poverty alleviation. They focus on income transfers and service provisions while aiming to alleviate both long- and short-term poverty through, among other things, education, health, security, and housing. Unlike previous programs that targeted the working class, new programs have successfully focused on locating and targeting the very poorest.

The impacts of social assistance programs vary between countries, and many programs have yet to be fully evaluated. According to Barrientos and Santibanez, the programs have been more successful in increasing investment in human capital than in bringing households above the poverty line. Challenges still exist, including the extreme inequality levels and the mass scale of poverty; locating a financial basis for programs; and deciding on exit strategies or on the long-term establishment of programs.^[50]

1980s impacts[edit]

The economic crisis of the 1980s led to a shift in social policies, as understandings of poverty and social programs evolved (24). New, mostly short-term programs emerged. These include:^[51]

Major aspects of current social assistance programs[edit]

New Zealand[edit]

New Zealand is often regarded as having one of the first comprehensive welfare systems in the world. During the 1890s a Liberal government adopted many social programmes to help the poor who had suffered from a long economic depression in the 1880s. One of the most far reaching was the passing of tax legislation that made it difficult for wealthy sheep farmers to hold onto their large land holdings. This and the invention of refrigeration led to a farming revolution where many sheep farms were broken up and sold to become smaller dairy farms. This enabled thousands of new farmers to buy land and develop a new and vigorous industry that has become the backbone of New Zealand's economy to this day. This liberal tradition flourished with increased enfranchisement for indigenous Maori in the 1880s and women. Pensions for the elderly, the poor and war casualties followed, with State-run schools, hospitals and subsidized medical and dental care. By 1960, New Zealand was able to afford one of the best-developed and most comprehensive welfare systems in the world, supported by a well-developed and stable economy.

Philippines[edit]

In Philippines, social welfare is divided into two. The first one is called Social Security System (SSS) and the other one is called Government Service Insurance System (GSIS). Social Security System or SSS is a social insurance program for workers in private sector. Individuals who are self-employed or not working can also apply to be protected under SSS programme. SSS provide benefits for unemployment, death, funeral, maternity leave, disabilities and many more. Members of SSS who experienced accident or death due to work activity, can also claim for double compensation under the Employees' Compensation (EC) programme. SSS also allows its members to apply for salary loans, based on their monthly salary and calamity loan, if their place is declared as "state of calamity" by the government. SSS also have two voluntary saving programs, PESO Fund and Flexi Fund to help prepare their members with a stable income for retirement. Government servants are protected under the Government Service Insurance System or GSIS. Just like SSS, GSIS also provide their members with retirement benefits, life insurance and employee compensation.^{[citation needed]}

Poland[edit]

South Africa[edit]

Spain[edit]

Sub-Saharan Africa[edit]

Sweden[edit]

Social welfare in Sweden is made up of several organizations and systems dealing with welfare. It is mostly funded by taxes, and executed by the public sector on all levels of government as well as private organizations. It can be separated into three parts falling under three different ministries; social welfare, falling under the responsibility of Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; education, under the responsibility of the Ministry of Education and Research and labor market, under the responsibility of Ministry of Employment.^[52]

Government pension payments are financed through an 18.5% pension tax on all taxed incomes in the country, which comes partly from a tax category called a public pension fee (7% on gross income), and 30% of a tax category called employer fees on salaries (which is 33% on a netted income). Since January 2001, the 18.5% is divided in two parts: 16% goes to current payments, and 2.5% goes into individual retirement accounts, which were introduced in 2001. Money saved and invested in government funds, and IRAs for future pension costs, are roughly five times annual government pension expenses (725/150).

Viewing Swedish welfare more broadly, it emerges as highly rated in many standard international comparisons of welfare or well-being (e.g. World Economic Forum 2020).^[53] However, some Nordic-based welfare and gender researchers have argued that such assessments, based on conventional welfare/well-being criteria, may to some extent over-privilege Sweden (and other Nordic countries) in terms of, for instance, gender and racial equality. For example, they suggest that if one takes a broader perspective on well-being incorporating issues associated with bodily integrity or bodily citizenship (Pringle 2011),^[54] then some major forms of men's domination and/or white privilege can be seen to still stubbornly persist in the Nordic countries, e.g. business, violence to women, sexual violence to children, the military, academia and religion (Hearn and Pringle 2006; Hearn et al. 2018; Pringle 2016).^[55]^[56]^[57]

United Kingdom[edit]

UK Government welfare expenditure 2011–12

The United Kingdom has a long history of welfare, notably including the English Poor laws which date back to 1536. After various reforms to the program, which involved workhouses, it was eventually abolished and replaced with a modern system by laws such as the National Assistance Act 1948.

In more recent times, comparing the Cameron–Clegg coalition's austerity measures with the Opposition's, the Financial Times commentator Martin Wolf commented that the "big shift from Labour ... is the cuts in welfare benefits."^[59] The government's austerity programme, which involves reduction in government policy, has been linked to a rise in food banks. A study published in the British Medical Journal in 2015 found that each one percentage point increase in the rate of Jobseeker's Allowance claimants sanctioned was associated with a 0.09 percentage point rise in food bank use.^[60] The austerity programme has faced opposition from disability rights groups for disproportionately affecting disabled people. The "bedroom tax" is an austerity measure that has attracted particular criticism, with activists arguing that two-thirds of council houses affected by the policy are occupied with a person with a disability.^[61]

United States[edit]

President Roosevelt signs the Social Security Act, 14 August 1935.

In the United States, depending on the context, the term "welfare" can be used to refer to means-tested cash benefits, especially the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program and its successor, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Block Grant, or it can be used to refer to all means-tested programs that help individuals or families meet basic needs, including, for example, health care through Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits and food and nutrition programs (SNAP). It can also include Social Insurance programs such as Unemployment Insurance, Social Security, and Medicare.

AFDC (originally called Aid to Dependent Children) was created during the Great Depression to alleviate the burden of poverty for families with children and allow widowed mothers to maintain their households. The New Deal employment program such as the Works Progress Administration primarily served men. Prior to the New Deal, anti-poverty programs were primarily operated by private charities or state or local governments; however, these programs were overwhelmed by the depth of need during the Depression.^[62] The United States has no national program of cash assistance for non-disabled poor individuals who are not raising children.

Until early in the year of 1965, the news media was conveying only whites as living in poverty however that perception had changed to blacks.^[63] Some of the influences in this shift could have been the civil rights movement and urban riots from the mid 60s. Welfare had then shifted from being a White issue to a Black issue and during this time frame the war on poverty had already begun.^[63] Subsequently, news media portrayed stereotypes of Blacks as lazy, undeserving and welfare queens. These shifts in media don't necessarily establish the population living in poverty decreasing.^[63]

A chart showing the overall decline of average monthly welfare benefits (AFDC then TANF) per recipient 1962–2006 (in 2006 dollars).^[64]

In 1996, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act changed the structure of Welfare payments and added new criteria to states that received Welfare funding. After reforms, which President Clinton said would "end Welfare as we know it",^[65] amounts from the federal government were given out in a flat rate per state based on population.^[66] Each state must meet certain criteria to ensure recipients are being encouraged to work themselves out of Welfare. The new program is called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).^[67]^[68] It encourages states to require some sort of employment search in exchange for providing funds to individuals, and imposes a five-year lifetime limit on cash assistance.^[65]^[67]^[69] In FY 2010, 31.8% of TANF families were white, 31.9% were African-American, and 30.0% were Hispanic.^[68]

According to the U.S. Census Bureau data released 13 September 2011, the nation's poverty rate rose to 15.1% (46.2 million) in 2010,^[70] up from 14.3% (approximately 43.6 million) in 2009 and to its highest level since 1993. In 2008, 13.2% (39.8 million) Americans lived in relative poverty.^[71]

In a 2011 op-ed in Forbes, Peter Ferrara stated that, "The best estimate of the cost of the 185 federal means tested Welfare programs for 2010 for the federal government alone is nearly $700 billion, up a third since 2008, according to the Heritage Foundation. Counting state spending, total Welfare spending for 2010 reached nearly $900 billion, up nearly one-fourth since 2008 (24.3%)."^[72] California, with 12% of the U.S. population, has one-third of the nation's welfare recipients.^[73]

In FY 2011, federal spending on means-tested welfare, plus state contributions to federal programs, reached $927 billion per year. Roughly half went to families with children, most of which are headed by a single parent.^[74]

The United States has also typically relied on charitable giving through non-profit agencies and fundraising instead of direct monetary assistance from the government itself. According to Giving USA, Americans gave $358.38 billion to charity in 2014. This is rewarded by the United States government through tax incentives for individuals and companies that are not typically seen in other countries.

Effects[edit]

The welfare-to-work intervention programme is unlikely to have any impacts on the mental and physical health of lone parents and children. Even when the employment and income rates were higher in this group of people, the poverty rate was high which could lead to persistently high rates of depression whether they were in the programme or not.^[75]

Income transfers can be either conditional or unconditional. Conditionalities are sometimes criticized as being paternalistic and unnecessary, and research in different contexts shows enforcing conditionalities can result in additional burdens for recipients and social service providers.^[76]

A 2008 study by welfare economist and Brown University Professor Allan M. Feldman^[77] suggests that welfare can achieve both competitive equilibrium and Pareto efficiency in the market.^[78] Though, different points of Pareto efficiency are more fair to some than others.^[79]

Some opponents of welfare argue that it affects work incentives.

Perception[edit]

According to a 2012 review study, whether a welfare program generates public support depends on:^[80]

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

Other sources[edit]

"social insurance" by Stefania Albanesi. Abstract.

"social insurance and public policy" by Jonathan Gruber Abstract.

"Welfare state" by Assar Lindbeck. Abstract.

[6] Except in the United States and Canada, where welfare refers only to direct financial assistance for poor or disabled people.^[2]^[3] In the United States it often refers to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, while "Social Security" is a specific social insurance program.^[4]^[5]

[16] 
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality. [...]
Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.^[14]

[1] "Social welfare program". Encyclopedia Britannica.

[2] Brown, Taylor Kate (26 August 2016). "How US welfare compares around the globe". BBC News.

[3] Gilles Séguin. "Welfare". Canadian Social Research. Archived from the original on 4 May 2012. Retrieved 10 February 2011.

[4] "Social Security Versus Welfare: Differences and Similarities". e-forms.us.

[5] "Social Security And Welfare – What Is The Difference?". www.get.com.

[WeissbrodtVega2007-7] Jump up to:^a ^b David S. Weissbrodt; Connie de la Vega (2007). International Human Rights Law: An Introduction. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-8122-4032-0.

[Robert2004-8] Walker, Robert (1 November 2004). Social Security And Welfare: Concepts And Comparisons: Concepts and Comparisons. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). p. 4. ISBN 978-0-335-20934-7.

[9] "International Labour Standards on Social security". www.ilo.org.

[Pennings2006-10] Frans Pennings (1 January 2006). Between Soft and Hard Law: The Impact of International Social Security Standards on National Social Security Law. Kluwer Law International B.V. pp. 32–41. ISBN 978-90-411-2491-3.

[Vrooman2009-11] J. C. Vrooman (2009). Rules of Relief: Institutions of Social Security, and Their Impact (PDF). Netherlands Institute for Social Research, SCP. pp. 111–126.

[Modern_Thought_Third_Edition_1999_p._919-12] Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought Third Edition (1999), Allan Bullock and Stephen Trombley Eds., p. 919.

[13] "Benthall, Jonathan & Bellion-Jourdan, J. The Charitable Crescent: Politics of Aid in the Muslim World, 2nd ed. (London: I.B. Tauris, 2009), p. 17". Retrieved 20 May 2020.

[14] "Social Security History". Social Security. 28 September 2019. Archived from the original on 28 September 2019. Retrieved 28 September 2019.

[UVvM-15] United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

[17] "Trajan". Britannica.com. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[18] "The Roman Empire: in the First Century. The Roman Empire. Emperors. Nerva & Trajan – PBS". Pbs.org. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[19] Robert Henry Nelson (2001). "Economics as religión: from Samuelson to Chicago and beyond". Penn State Press. p. 103. ISBN 0-271-02095-4

[20] "Chapter1: Charity and Welfare", the American Academy of Research Historians of Medieval Spain.

[Jones1997-21] Philip Jones (22 May 1997). The Italian City-State: From Commune to Signoria. Clarendon Press. p. 447. ISBN 978-0-19-159030-6.

[Leeuwen2016-22] Marco H. D. Van Leeuwen (31 August 2016). Mutual Insurance 1550-2015: From Guild Welfare and Friendly Societies to Contemporary Micro-Insurers. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 70–71. ISBN 978-1-137-53110-0.

[HarrisBridgen2012-23] Bernard Harris; Paul Bridgen (6 April 2012). Charity and Mutual Aid in Europe and North America Since 1800. Routledge. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-134-21508-9.

[CollinsTaylor2008-24] James B. Collins; Karen L. Taylor (15 April 2008). Early Modern Europe: Issues and Interpretations. John Wiley & Sons. p. 224. ISBN 978-1-4051-5207-5.

[25] "Benthall, Jonathan & Bellion-Jourdan, J. The Charitable Crescent: Politics of Aid in the Muslim World, 2nd ed. (London: I.B. Tauris, 2009), p. 17". Retrieved 20 May 2020.

[26] Benthal, Jonathan. "The Qur'an's Call to Alms Zakat, the Muslim Tradition of Alms-giving" (PDF). ISIM Newsletter. 98 (1): 13.

[27] M.A. Mohamed Salih (2004). Alexander De Waal (ed.). Islamism and its enemies in the Horn of Africa. Indiana University Press. pp. 148–149. ISBN 978-0-253-34403-8.

[28] Fauzia, Amelia (2013). Faith and the State: A History of Islamic Philanthropy in Indonesia. Brill. p. 45-55. ISBN 9789004233973.

[29] The Poor Laws of England Archived 5 January 2010 at the Wayback Machine at EH.Net

[WB-30] Jump up to:^a ^b World Bank World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. Chapter 6

[31] Liberal Reforms at BBC Bitesize

[32] Shorto, Russell (29 April 2009). Going Dutch. The New York Times (magazine). Retrieved: 11 June 2016.

[33] Paul K. Edwards and Tony Elger, The global economy, national states and the regulation of labour (1999) p. 111

[34] Ferragina, Emanuele; Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin (30 October 2011). "Thematic Review: Welfare regime debate: past, present, futures?" (PDF). Policy & Politics. 39 (4): 583–611. doi:10.1332/030557311X603592.

[35] "More than 70 per cent of the world population lacks proper social protection". ilo.org. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2018.

[36] "Types of social protection". GSDRC.

[37] "Track 2: Social Security and Social Protection: Developing Discourses". www.ilera2015.com.

[38] Mendoza, Roger Lee (1990). The political economy of population control and retirement security in China, India and the Philippines. Philippine Economic Review, 31(2): 174–191.

[abs-1988-39] Jump up to:^a ^b ^c "History of Pensions and Other Benefits in Australia". Year Book Australia, 1988. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1988. Archived from the original on 23 December 2014. Retrieved 23 December 2014.

[dict-syd-2008-40] Garton, Stephen (2008). "Health and welfare". The Dictionary of Sydney. Archived from the original on 15 August 2012. Retrieved 23 December 2014.

[australia-wr-2000-41] Jump up to:^a ^b Yeend, Peter (September 2000). "Welfare Review". Parliament of Australia. Archived from the original on 23 December 2014. Retrieved 23 December 2014.

[Canada-42] "National Standards and Social Programs: What the Federal Government Can Do (BP379e)". 2.parl.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 5 January 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[govtransfers-43] "Government transfer payments to persons". Web.rchive.org. 4 November 2008. Archived from the original on 4 November 2008. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[44] Samuel Lézé, "France", in: Andrew Scull (ed.), Cultural Sociology of Mental Illness : an A-to-Z Guide, Sage, 2014, pp. 316–17

[45] Allan Mitchell, A Divided Path: The German Influence on Social Reform in France After 1870 (1991)

[46] Paul V. Dutton, Origins of the French welfare state: The struggle for social reform in France, 1914–1947. (Cambridge UP, 2002). online

[47] "Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth". Bmfsfj.de. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[48] "Society". Tatsachen-ueber-deutschland.de. 15 September 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[49] "European Welfare States – Information and Resources". Pitt.edu. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[50] "The Evolution of Social Policy in Japan" (PDF). Siteresources.worldbank.org. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[51] "ABCD" (PDF). Jcer.or.jp. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[test-52] Jump up to:^a ^b Barrientos, A. and Claudio Santibanez. (2009). "New Forms of Social, Assistance and the Evolution of Social Protection in Latin America". Journal of Latin American Studies. Cambridge University Press 41, 1–26

[test1-53] "Home – Chronic Poverty Research Centre". Chronicpoverty.org. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[departementen-54] "Regeringskansliet med departementen". Regeringen.se (in Swedish). Retrieved 26 February 2010.

[55] World Economic Forum (2019). "Mind the 100 Year Gap, 2020". Retrieved 19 January 2021. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)

[56] Pringle, Keith (2011). "Comparative Studies of Well-Being in Terms of Gender, Ethnicity and the Concept of Bodily Citizenship: Turning Esping-Andersen on His Head?", in: Oleksy E , Hearn J , Golańska D (eds.): "The Limits of Gendered Citizenship: Contexts and Complexities". London: Routledge. pp. 137–156. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[57] Hearn Jeff , Pringle Keith (2006). European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities: National and Transnational Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[58] Hearn Jeff , Pringle Keith , Balkmar Dag (2018). Men, Masculinities and Social Policy , in: Shaver Sheila (ed.): "Handbook of Gender and Social Policy". Oxford: Edward Elgar. pp. 55–73. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

[59] Pringle, Keith (2016). Doing (Oppressive) Gender via Men’s Relations with Children , in: Hayren, A, Henriksson HW (eds.): "Critical Perspectives on Masculinities and Relationalities: In Relation to What?". New York: Springer. pp. 23–34. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[guardian-interactive11-12-60] Rogers, Simon; Blight, Garry (4 December 2012). "Public spending by UK government department 2011–12: an interactive guide". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 April 2013.

[FT_28102010-61] Martin Wolf (28 October 2011). "Britain has gone climbing without a rope". The Financial Times. Archived from the original on 1 November 2010.

[62] Loopstra, Rachel (2015). "Austerity, sanctions, and the rise of food banks in the UK" (PDF). BMJ. 350: 2. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1775. hdl:10044/1/57549. PMID 25854525. S2CID 45641347. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 June 2015. Retrieved 25 June 2015.

[63] Ryan, Frances (16 July 2013). "'Bedroom tax' puts added burden on disabled people". Retrieved 25 June 2015.

[64] Katz, Michael B. (1988). In the Shadow Of the Poorhouse: A Social History Of Welfare In America. New York: Basic Books.

[:0-65] Jump up to:^a ^b ^c Soss, Joe; Fording, Richard C. (2003). Schram, Sanford F. (ed.). Race and the politics of welfare reform ([Online-Ausg.]. ed.). Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0472068319.

[autogenerated1-66] "Indicators of Welfare Dependence: Annual Report to Congress, 2008". Aspe.hhs.gov. 19 April 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2017.

[nytimes_tanf-67] Jump up to:^a ^b Deparle, Jason (2 February 2009). "Welfare Aid Isn't Growing as Economy Drops Off". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 February 2009.

[national_review-68] "Ending Welfare Reform as We Knew It". The National Review. 12 February 2009. Retrieved 12 February 2009.

[heritage-69] Jump up to:^a ^b "Stimulus Bill Abolishes Welfare Reform and Adds New Welfare Spending". Heritage Foundation. 11 February 2009. Archived from the original on 1 March 2009. Retrieved 12 February 2009.

[TANF-70] Jump up to:^a ^b "Characteristics and Financial Circumstances of TANF Recipients – Fiscal Year 2010". United States Department of Health and Human Services.

[nytimes_clinton-71] Goodman, Peter S. (11 April 2008). "From Welfare Shift in '96, a Reminder for Clinton". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 February 2009.

[72] "Revised govt formula shows new poverty high: 49.1M". Yahoo! News. 7 November 2011

[2009_Poverty_Rate_Reuters-73] "Poverty rate hits 15-year high". Reuters. 17 September 2010

[74] Ferrara, Peter (22 April 2011). "America's Ever Expanding Welfare Empire". Forbes. Retrieved 10 April 2012.

[75] "California lawmakers again waging political warfare over welfare". Los Angeles Times. 24 June 2012

[SMG-76] Dawn (9 January 2014), Grants for Single Mother, Single Mother Guide, retrieved 9 January 2014

[77] Gibson M, Thomson H, Banas K, Lutje V, McKee MJ, Martin SP, Fenton C, Bambra C, Bond L (26 February 2018). "Welfare-to-work Interventions and Their Effects on the Mental and Physical Health of Lone Parents and Their Children". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 (2): CD009820. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009820.pub3. PMC 5846185. PMID 29480555.

[78] Bielefeld, Shelley; Harb, Jenna; Henne, Kathryn (2021-09-21). "Financialization and Welfare Surveillance: Regulating the Poor in Technological Times". Surveillance & Society. 19 (3): 299–316. doi:10.24908/ss.v19i3.14244. ISSN 1477-7487.

[79] "Allan M. Feldman". Brown University.

[80] Feldman, Allan M. (31 March 2017). Vernengo, Matias; Perez Caldentey, Esteban; Rosser Jr, Barkley J. (eds.). "Welfare Economics". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd ed.): 1–14. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1417-2. ISBN 978-1-349-95121-5.

[81] "U-M Weblogin". weblogin.umich.edu. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1417-2. Retrieved 8 December 2021.

[82] Campbell, Andrea Louise (11 May 2012). "Policy Makes Mass Politics". Annual Review of Political Science. 15 (1): 333–351. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202. ISSN 1094-2939.

শুক্রবার, ১৫ এপ্রিল, ২০২২

WelftionWelfareNewsUpdate

Seo Construction

একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন